BE IT ENACTED BY THE YOUTH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA YOUTH LEGISLATURE –
Disestablish the M’Naghten Rule
This bill will provide a pathway to disestablishing the M’Naghten rule as the standard for the determination of an
insanity defense. There will then be a new standard put into place, taking into greater account the level of violence in
the crime committed as well as the likeliness of recidivism. This new standard should come in either the form of a new
test with modern guidelines, such as the Moral Penal Code Test (MPC); or with an abolishment of the insanity defense as
a whole, with instead an emphasis on using mental health as a mitigating factor to Mens Rea.
SECTION II - JUSTIFICATION
The M’Naghten Rule dates back to mid 19th century England, and was already considered defunct in the state of New
Hampshire. The product of the M’Naghten Rule in Canada, where it is codified into national law, is a 17% recidivism rate
following a NGRI/GBMI ruling and subsequent release from a mental facility. Although not awful, recidivism in these
cases is significantly easier to spot - the rate should be lower than 10%. While US data is unreliable due to a lack of
research, individual cases of recidivism are proof enough. Gary Muehlberg, who was charged with rape and robbery of an
eighteen year old girl, was found NGRI due to the MNaghten’s non-consideration of violence. Two months after release, he
committed the same acts on a fourteen year old girl. Studies have shown that recidivism among those found NGRI/GBMI
impacts others at a much higher rate than those who do not receive such a ruling. M’Naghten contributes to this as it
forces the judicial system to give lesser sentences to violent criminals through it's non consideration of violence.
SECTION III - DEFINITIONS
M’Naghten Rule - The current standard for certifying a plea of insanity. The exact language used in Minnesota is, “No
person having a mental illness or cognitive impairment so as to be incapable of understanding the proceedings or making
a defense shall be tried, sentenced, or punished for any crime; but the person shall not be excused from criminal
liability except upon proof that at the time of committing the alleged criminal act the person was laboring under such a
defect of reason, from one of these causes, as not to know the nature of the act, or that it was wrong.”(Minnesota
Statutes 2025, Section 611.026)
Moral Penal Code Test: A modernized insanity test from the American Legal Institute, fixing many of the issues found in
Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity (NGRI): A finding that a defendant was not legally responsible for their actions due to
a mental illness at the time of the offense.
Guilty but Mentally Ill (GBMI): A finding for a defendant who is found guilty of a crime but also has a mental illness
that is not severe enough to meet the legal standard for insanity.
Recidivism: The tendency of a convicted criminal to reoffend.
Mens Rea: The intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct
Funding for the bill will include staffing and other support for the working group in Section V, which will be derived
from attorney licensure fees paid to the state, not to exceed $30,000 per year.
SECTION V – PENALTIES/ENFORCEMENT
A working group will be appointed to work through the logistical complexities of such a change. This working group will
be responsible for removing the test as standard, finding a new standard, and other actions deemed necessary and proper
for them to undertake. The members of this working group will be appointed by the governor and must include majority and
minority members of the Minnesota House of Representatives and Minnesota Senate, and members of the Judicial branch.
SECTION VI – EFFECTIVE DATE
The working group will be appointed by the Governor no later than the start of the 2027 legislative session. Following
this, the working group will be expected to be done with their work by the start of the 2028 legislative session.
Courtroom reforms; training for public defenders, prosecutors, and judges; and jury education will be completed no later
than the first day of the year 2030.